Lees Family Law, Ltd.Lees Family Law, Ltd.2024-02-09T19:48:44Zhttps://www.leesfamilylaw.com/feed/atom/WordPress/wp-content/uploads/sites/1201173/2019/07/cropped-site-icon-32x32.pngOn Behalf of Lees Family Law, Ltd.https://www.leesfamilylaw.com/?p=503872024-02-06T19:48:53Z2024-02-09T19:48:44ZUndermining the best interests of the child
In Minnesota, 22.6% of the population are children younger than 18 years. Minnesota family courts prioritize the best interests of children when making custody and parenting time decisions. The courts may view negative communication about the other parent as an attempt to undermine the child's relationship with that parent. This may be detrimental to the child’s well-being.
Also, family courts consider the conduct of both parents. Speaking poorly about the other parent can indicate a lack of cooperation and an inability to foster a positive co-parenting relationship. This may influence the court's decision when determining custody. It may potentially lead to unfavorable outcomes for the parent engaging in negative communication.
Creating unnecessary conflict
Negative talk about the other parent often fuels conflict. It makes the divorce process more challenging for everyone. Minnesota encourages divorcing couples to engage in alternative dispute resolution methods, such as mediation, to reach agreements amicably.
Engaging in verbal attacks or spreading negativity about the other parent can escalate tensions and hinder the possibility of a fair and cooperative resolution.
Affecting co-parenting relationships
Maintaining a healthy co-parenting relationship helps the well-being of the children post-divorce. Talking negatively about the other parent can strain this relationship, making it difficult to collaborate on important decisions regarding the children's upbringing. Effective co-parenting requires open communication and a willingness to work together.
Maintaining respect and avoiding negative communication about the other parent can contribute to a smoother divorce process.]]>On Behalf of Lees Family Law, Ltd.https://www.leesfamilylaw.com/?p=503862024-01-10T22:27:45Z2024-01-10T22:27:45Z1. Duration of marriage and eligibility
Minnesota law typically requires a minimum duration of marriage to qualify for spousal support. Marriages that dissolve within a year may not meet this criterion, often making spousal support less likely. The reasoning is that such short-term unions may not have allowed for substantial economic interdependence between the spouses.
2. Exceptional circumstances
Despite the general trend, there are instances where spousal support might be possible even in marriages under one year. Courts may examine exceptional circumstances, such as one spouse giving up a career opportunity or making significant financial sacrifices for the benefit of the marriage during its short duration. In these cases, the court may find it justifiable to award spousal support.
3. Standard of living during marriage
When evaluating the need for spousal support, the court considers the standard of living during the marriage. In short-term marriages, maintaining the same standard of living may be challenging to establish due to the limited duration.
However, if a spouse can demonstrate a substantial change in financial circumstances resulting from the marriage, the court may take such factors into account. For example, one spouse may have a very high income while the other does not. In Edina, the median household income is $125,506.
4. Financial independence and self-sufficiency
In cases of marriages ending within a year, the court often encourages both parties to achieve financial independence and self-sufficiency. The focus is on each spouse's ability to support themselves without relying on the other. This approach aligns with the belief that short-term marriages may not warrant long-term financial obligations.
Ultimately, the emphasis as far as spousal support lies on promoting financial independence and self-sufficiency for both parties following the dissolution of a short-term marriage.]]>On Behalf of Lees Family Law, Ltd.https://www.leesfamilylaw.com/?p=503852023-12-15T21:20:27Z2023-12-15T21:20:27Z1. Separation of joint accounts
When couples share credit cards, mortgages or other loans, these financial ties need cutting. Closing joint accounts or transferring balances to individual accounts helps in establishing financial independence post-divorce.
However, if these actions do not occur, then missed payments or outstanding debts on joint accounts could potentially affect credit scores. The average credit score in Minnesota is 742.
2. Credit responsibility
Minnesota follows the principle of equitable distribution in divorce proceedings, meaning the fair but not necessarily equal division of marital property. Despite this, lenders may still hold both parties responsible for joint debts. Even if a divorce decree assigns certain debts to one spouse, creditors can still pursue the other person in cases of missed payments. The responsible party needs to refinance or close joint accounts to avoid any negative impact on credit scores.
3. Credit reporting agencies
Credit reporting agencies gather information from various sources, including lenders and financial institutions. These sources may report missed payments and other financial changes that accompany divorce to credit bureaus. People undergoing divorce should monitor their credit reports for accuracy and fix any discrepancies.
Opening individual accounts, including credit cards and bank accounts, helps in creating a separate financial identity after divorce. Responsible financial management, such as making payments on time and maintaining a good credit history, helps rebuild or preserve credit scores.]]>On Behalf of Lees Family Law, Ltd.https://www.leesfamilylaw.com/?p=503842023-11-10T19:11:01Z2023-11-10T19:11:01ZHistorical perspectives
Traditionally, there existed a perception that mothers were more likely to get custody, often attributed to societal norms and gender roles. However, as the understanding of parenting roles evolves, so too has the legal landscape. Minnesota, like many states, now emphasizes the best interests of the child as the primary consideration in custody decisions.
Current legal framework
The family law system strives to ensure an unbiased approach to child custody cases. By law, courts must evaluate various factors when determining what arrangement would serve the child's best interests. These factors include the child's physical and emotional well-being, the parents' ability to provide a stable environment and the child's existing relationships within the family.
Gender neutrality in custody decisions
Recent trends indicate a shift toward gender neutrality in custody decisions. Courts are increasingly recognizing the importance of shared parenting responsibilities. Rather than defaulting to traditional stereotypes, judges are focusing on each parent's ability to meet the child's needs.
Challenges and considerations
Despite this progress, challenges persist. Preconceived notions about maternal caregiving abilities can linger, influencing perceptions during legal proceedings. In 2019, 25.8% of children under 18 lived with one mother. While only 4.4% lived with their father only, that percentage is up from 3.2% in 2007.
While the notion that courts inherently favor mothers may have historical roots, the legal landscape now focuses on the well-being of the child. The shift toward gender-neutral custody decisions reflects a commitment to fairness and parental equality.]]>On Behalf of Lees Family Law, Ltd.https://www.leesfamilylaw.com/?p=503832023-10-12T21:29:22Z2023-10-12T21:29:22ZUnderstanding your retirement savings
In 2021, 689,308 people experienced the financial challenges of divorce, including divisions in their retirement savings. Start by getting a clear picture of what retirement savings you have. Look at statements for your retirement accounts, pension plans and investments. Also, calculate your spouse’s retirement accounts.
Understanding state laws different
Minnesota is an equitable distribution state. Therefore, the courts do not divide marital property evenly between the spouses. Other states split property equally, while the judge determines the property division in equitable distribution states.
Keeping communication with your spouse open
During a divorce, talk openly with your spouse. Discuss how you will divide your retirement savings. If you can agree on a fair plan, you can save time, money and stress. A financial advisor or mediator for guidance can provide valuable advice on how to protect your money and plan for retirement after the divorce.
Maintaining your accounts
If you decide to divide your accounts, use a qualified domestic relations order. A QDRO is a legal document that helps split retirement accounts like 401(k)s and pensions without penalties. Review and update the people who will get your retirement savings if you pass away. Make sure it matches your post-divorce wishes.
Creating a new financial plan
Your financial situation will change after a divorce. Make a new budget, investment strategy and plan for your retirement. Also, monitor your credit reports and work to maintain good credit during and after the divorce.
Negotiation and robust information will best protect your retirement accounts.]]>On Behalf of Lees Family Law, Ltd.https://www.leesfamilylaw.com/?p=503822023-09-14T23:49:47Z2023-09-14T23:49:47ZUnderstanding equitable distribution
Minnesota follows the principle of equitable distribution when dividing marital assets. Equitable distribution does not mean equal distribution, but rather, it aims to be fair. The court takes into account various factors to determine what is fair, ensuring that both parties are reasonably provided for.
Marital vs. non-marital assets
Before dividing assets, it is important to distinguish between marital and non-marital property. Marital property typically includes assets acquired during the marriage, such as homes, vehicles, and joint bank accounts. Non-marital property, on the other hand, includes assets owned by one spouse before the marriage or received as gifts or inheritances during the marriage. Non-marital property generally remains with the original owner.
Factors considered by the court
Several factors influence the court's decision when distributing marital assets, including:
Duration of the marriage
Contributions by each spouse
Economic circumstances
Health and age
Marital debts
Once the court has assessed these factors, it will allocate assets and debts in a way it deems fair. This may involve selling certain assets, such as a house, and dividing the proceeds. Alternatively, one spouse may retain certain assets while the other receives a monetary settlement.
While more than 600,000 divorces happen each year, every situation is different. In Minnesota, the court's goal is to ensure that both parties can maintain a reasonably comparable standard of living after the divorce.]]>On Behalf of Lees Family Law, Ltd.https://www.leesfamilylaw.com/?p=503812023-08-05T04:23:10Z2023-08-05T04:23:10Zmarital affair, others simply cannot bounce back. When an affair plays a key role in a divorce, the non-cheating spouse may wonder what effect it may have on the divorce’s outcome.
1. Will marital misconduct affect the division of property?
In Minnesota, the judge must consider many factors to determine an equitable distribution of property and assets. Typically, an affair does not factor into that equation. Although cheating does not mean losing out on a fair share, the affair may come into play if the couple settles out of court or has a prenuptial agreement that includes infidelity penalties.
2. Could an affair lead to a marital asset dissipation claim?
The courts do factor in marital asset dissipation. This involves one spouse consciously spending too much money, selling off assets, hiding assets, or giving away marital property. If proven, money spent on the affair may result in the offending spouse having to reimburse those funds in some manner.
3. Will adultery factor into child custody?
Minnesota judges must follow specific guidelines when determining child custody and support. In most cases, a judge will want to ensure a 50/50 split of time spent with each parent. While many nuances of the specific case may factor in, an affair typically does not. The court makes judgments based on the best interest of a child. That may change if a spouse’s new partner has a history of abuse.
While an affair may leave a lasting mark, it typically does not mean getting more out of the divorce settlement.]]>On Behalf of Lees Family Law, Ltd.https://www.leesfamilylaw.com/?p=503802023-07-04T21:29:16Z2023-07-04T21:29:16Zempty nest or retirement trigger an awareness that the marriage is no longer what they thought it was.
When you consider a divorce in your later years, there are a few key financial considerations.
Alimony considerations
While alimony considerations are common in any divorce, gray divorce brings unique factors. For example, younger couples may find that the stay-at-home parent has lost a few years in the workforce but can return fairly easily, so short-term alimony covers their needs. With gray divorce, a stay-at-home spouse has often been out of the workforce for decades and may have concerns with health issues that prohibit a return. The primary income earner might pay spousal support for many years to come in these cases.
Retirement planning challenges
When you decide on divorce before retiring, you should assess your retirement funds and goals carefully in the process. Remember that you only get your share of retirement assets, so make sure you have the time necessary to fulfill your full retirement savings needs. Gray divorce often means fewer years left to retirement, which might require aggressive retirement savings efforts.
Understanding some of the financial considerations of gray divorce can help you prepare before you file. Take careful stock of your financial position and any opportunities you may have as you decide whether divorce is the right option for your relationship.]]>On Behalf of Lees Family Law, Ltd.https://www.leesfamilylaw.com/?p=503002023-06-07T19:13:03Z2023-06-07T19:13:03Zchild custody decisions.
The best interest of the child
In most custody cases, judges focus on providing a living situation that is in the best interests of the child. Judges consider financial, physical and emotional stability. Mental health can impact a child’s best interest, and judges may require an evaluation prior to ruling on custody.
Factors judges consider
Family court judges may consider several factors when they consider whether a mentally ill parent should gain custody of a minor child. First, they should consider whether the illness results in behavior that could or has harmed the child. They may question whether the illness will get worse and whether treatment will help eliminate the symptoms.
Judges will likely ask these parents if they receive or will willingly seek help. They may also speak with children to determine what they know and understand about their parents’ illnesses as well as whether and how often they saw mental health episodes in their parents.
Loss of custody
Parents can lose custody and parental rights under a few circumstances. However, they likely have to be unable to provide and care for their children. Abuse due to mental illness may also result in a loss of custody.
Conditions like PTSD, anxiety and bipolar disorder do not automatically result in loss of parental rights or lack of custody rights. The condition’s severity and its impact on the children are the primary focus. Judges also want to see parents seeking treatment.
Parent-child relationships significantly impact custody decisions, but most family law judges will focus on what is best for the children.]]>On Behalf of Lees Family Law, Ltd.https://www.leesfamilylaw.com/?p=502982023-05-01T15:13:21Z2023-05-01T15:13:21ZChild-centered divorce
It is essential to think about the child when considering child custody. They should be the utmost priority in a divorce. They did not choose the divorce, and they are not at fault. They are in the middle.
Imagine that your best friend disappears overnight or that the grandparents you saw on a weekly basis went away without warning. If we think about it this way, it can allow us to put ourselves in our children’s shoes and understand how traumatic it could be to separate them from the people they have been around and have developed relationships with since they were small.
Children need allies
In addition, it is essential to know that these relationships, and keeping them alive for your child, can help them cope with the stress of divorce. Children might have strong feelings toward their parents, who they see as the ones causing the distress in their lives and having other bonds may serve them well and provide them with the emotional support they need to get through this tough time.
Divorce is complicated and challenging for everyone involved, and it is natural for parents to get caught up in the legal aspect of divorce and place most of their focus on making decisions for the future. Still, it is critically important to think of your child now and how they feel.
Most importantly, it is imperative to consider how to provide your children with the emotional support they need during this time and in the future, which often means considering their relationships with others and how to maintain them after the divorce is final.]]>